This case study demonstrates how Flownex SE simulates free cooling in a data center near a water mass, using indirect waterside and evaporative cooling methods. Results show over 70% electricity savings for cooling, reducing costs and carbon footprint. Flownex enables efficient transient simulations and optimal design of cooling hardware, aiding energy-efficient data center operation.
|
CHALLENGE
Data centers require a significant amount of cooling to maintain the electronic equipment within acceptable temperature ranges. The deployment of free cooling methods can significantly reduce the energy consumption within a data center. In this analysis a data center was modelled that is located near a water mass. This water mass could be used for either indirect evaporative cooling or waterside cooling. The primary challenge was to quantify the energy savings that could be achieved by switching the chosen data center from active cooling to free cooling.
BENEFITS
Using Flownex SE provided access to the built-in fluid properties (air, water, humid air, refrigerants) and component libraries for fluid flow and heat transfer. This enabled the development of energy performance models in a time-efficient manner, whilst capturing all the relevant heat transfer and fluid flow phenomena. Due to the low computational cost of the models, transient simulations could be conducted over extended periods with relatively short simulation times.
SOLUTION
The Flownex SE models included the relevant properties of the data center, as well as the outdoor ambient temperature and humidity conditions for the site, in order to build a model of the performance of the free cooling concepts at different times in a year. The results of the case study show that a >70% reduction in the electricity demand for cooling can be achieved using free cooling. These identified savings can be further used to develop a business case for future implementation at the target site.
INTRODUCTION
As the demand for data-driven services increase, it is important to ensure the optimal energy consumption of data centers. One way to reduce electricity costs and by extension the carbon footprint of data centers, is by using free cooling methods. Free cooling uses freely available natural resources e.g. ponds or ambient air, to provide cooling energy. The two free cooling methods investigated in this case study are:
Indirect waterside free cooling, using water circulation through a fluid-to-air heat exchanger, and
Indirect evaporative cooling, using the humidification of air and an air-to-air heat exchanger.
It is important to note that using indirect free cooling methods ensure that no water needs to enter the data center, which was one of the constraints for the study.
METHODOLOGY
A network model of the data center room was created in Flownex that represents a hot aisle/cold aisle configuration with a baseload cooling demand of 66.5 kWth. The volume of air in the isles is represented using the reservoir component, and leakage between the aisles is modelled by added flow components between the reservoirs. The full data center model can be seen in Figure 1, which incorporates 19 server racks. Compound components were created to model the fluid flow through the server racks and heat loads.
The baseline energy consumption using the in-row coolers was established based on a R410a vapor compression refrigeration cycle model in Flownex. The Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the cycle was calculated to determine the required electricity to meet the cooling demand. The COP for the in-row coolers varied from 3.5 to 7 depending on the outdoor ambient temperature.
To implement the free-cooling solution into the data center, air is extracted from the hot aisle and ducted to a heat exchanger outside the data center, where it is cooled. If the free cooling is insufficient to meet the demand, the backup cooling is provided from an R410a refrigeration unit. The Flownex models of the two free cooling concepts of Indirect Evaporative Cooling (IEC) and Waterside Cooling (WC) are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively. In the IEC approach, air is drawn from the environment and humidified through water injection. This increases the relative humidity and decreases the air temperature. As the humid air cannot be directly ducted into the server room, it passes through an air-to-air heat exchanger where it cools the hot air from the servers.
In the WC approach, a water-to-air heat exchanger is used to reduce the temperature of the hot air in the data center. The WC is generally less effective at providing cooling than the IEC, however it does have the advantage of no water consumption from the pond next door, as it is a closed loop pumping system.
RESULTS & CONCLUSION
In this case study Flownex aided in the development of a data center cooling model. The tool allowed the swift and modular development of free cooling technologies in a data center. A transient simulation was completed using historical weather data as input. The comparison of the savings on active cooling (electricity) in the data center for the two free cooling methods are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: The electricity savings results from the study.
| Indirect waterside cooling | Indirect evaporative cooling | ||
| Feb – Mar | Jun – Jul | Feb – Mar | Jun – Jul |
Active cooling before free cooling | 17.2 MWh | 15.5 MWh | 15.5 MWh | 15.5 MWh |
Active cooling after free cooling | 4.6 MWh 26.5% | 0.42 kWh 0.0% | 1.6 MWh 10.5% | 38.4 kWh 0.2% |
Savings by using free cooling | 12.7 MWh 73.6% | 15.5 MWh 100% | 14.2 MWh 91.1% | 15.5 MWh 100% |
The Flownex models not only provide information about the potential performance savings, but they also allow for the optimal design of the hardware required e.g. pumps, fans, piping, and heat exchangers. This facilitates a smooth transition from performance modelling to solution implementation.