Authors: J. P. van Ravenswaay, G. P. Greyvenstein, W. M. K. van Niekerk, J. T. Labuschagne
Year: 2006
Industry: Nuclear & SMR
Keywords: Use FSE, Dynamic, HTGR, Pebble Bed, Validation, Comparison, Verification
ABSTRACT
Regulatory requirements prescribe extensive verification and validation (V&V) of computer codes that are used in the design and analysis of accident conditions in nuclear plants. Flownex is a dynamic systems CFD code used as the primary thermal-fluid simulation code by the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Company (PBMR).
Stringent quality assurance processes have been implemented to ensure that the code conforms to the set standards. These processes include the comparison of Flownex with analytical results as well as with experimental data.
The results of this process are summarized in this paper. Analytical solutions are used to verify Flownex's element models so as to ensure that the basic theory is correctly implemented in the computer code. As part of the analytical V&V effort various well-defined problems are solved using numerical methods implemented in independent computer codes.
Comparison with experimental and plant data is a very important feature of the V&V program to validate that the chosen theory is fit for purpose. For this, validation data from the pebble bed micro model (PBMM) is used. In addition to the PBMM experimental data Flownex is compared to a number of small thermal-fluid experiments in which certain specific component phenomena is validated. These experiments were developed in collaboration with North-West University (previously Potchefstroom University).